Selected projects
Schemes we have worked on
Described by shape and by commercial problem rather than by name. Client, address and design team stay out of it unless every party has agreed in writing that they can appear.
Six storey residential, three blocks
East London, constrained high road frontage, repeated flat types over the upper floors
Further schemes are added as consent allows. Where a client is content to be named and the design team licences the drawings, the entry carries the address and the images. Until then it carries the shape of the job and nothing that identifies anybody.
Why these are anonymous
The commercial detail of a scheme is not ours to publish
Three separate interests sit in a construction project, and none of them belong to the consultant. The commercial position is the client's. The drawings are the design team's copyright, usually with a note on the title block saying no licence is implied. The scheme itself may not yet have planning consent, and naming an unconsented site can damage the position of the party who is paying us.
So the default is anonymous. A scheme appears by type, scale, stage and construction value, because those describe the work without describing the parties. A named entry requires written consent from the client, and where a drawing appears, a licence from the practice that produced it.
The same reasoning sits behind how we handle conflicts. What a client tells us is the client's, and it stays that way after the job closes.
Insights