Contract provisions
The payment terms as written, including any amendments, and what they require of each party at each stage.
Payment disputes
Payment disputes are decided on dates and notices far more often than on measurement. One cycle reviewed end to end tells you where you actually stand.
The application, read as assessed: what was applied for, how it was presented, and whether an assessor could follow it without reconstructing it.
Every date in the cycle: due date, final date for payment, and the periods for each notice, taken from the contract rather than from habit.
The notices themselves: whether a payment notice was served, whether a pay less notice was served in time, and whether either says what it must.
Your exposure, stated plainly: what is payable, what is at risk, and whether there is a position worth pursuing before the next payment falls due.
The problem
The sum in dispute is usually not the reason the money is not moving. The reason is a date, a notice, or a claim nobody can follow.
A notice served a day late can change what is payable regardless of the merits, and a notice served on time but without the required detail can fail for a different reason.
An application assessed by somebody looking for reasons to pay less will find the easiest one first, and the easiest one is almost always that the claim cannot be followed from the documents attached to it.
Where the contract has been amended, the statutory framework and the contract say different things about the same deadline, and the amendment usually wins unless it does not comply, which is a question worth answering before the next cycle rather than after.
What the review covers
A defined piece of work with a written deliverable and a clear scope. Fees are agreed individually based on the nature, complexity and scope of the matter.
The payment terms as written, including any amendments, and what they require of each party at each stage.
Whether the application is capable of being assessed as submitted, and what is missing if it is not.
Whether it was served, when, by whom, and whether it states the sum considered due and the basis of calculation.
The same questions, against a shorter deadline, where the consequences of getting it wrong fall on the paying party.
Due date and final date for payment established from the contract, not assumed from the pattern of previous months.
What follows from the position as it stands, what the next cycle requires, and what to put right before it begins.
A notice that is late is late whatever the merits. That is the whole point of the regime, and it cuts both ways.
This is a commercial and contractual assessment, not legal advice. It tells you what the contract provides, what was served and when, and what that means for the money in this cycle. Where the position turns on legal interpretation or on enforcement, you need a construction solicitor, and we will say so.
The statutory payment framework in England and Wales applies to most construction contracts, but not to a contract with a residential occupier. If you are a homeowner having work done on the house you live in, the notices and deadlines you have read about may not apply to your contract at all, and the contract itself governs.
Questions
Then the position depends on what the payment notice said, and on whether the application became the notified sum. That is exactly the question the review answers, from your contract rather than from the general rule, because amended contracts change the mechanism more often than people expect.
Yes, and on a running dispute that is usually the right scope, because the pattern across several months tells you more than any single month. It is quoted separately.
Possibly not. A contract with somebody having work done on the dwelling they occupy or intend to occupy sits outside the statutory framework. The contract still governs, and we read that instead.
Yes. If the notice was valid and the position is weak, you will be told that in writing. Knowing early is worth more than finding out at adjudication.
Insights

The payment provisions are the only part of a construction contract where being right about the money does not help...
Read the article
An application for payment is a claim for money, and it is assessed by somebody whose job is to find reasons to pay...
Read the article
The application is what the contractor believes they are owed. The certificate is what an independent assessment...
Read the article